<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Pictoral Argument Against the Medicare Buy In</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthblog.ncpa.org/a-pictoral-argument-against-the-medicare-buy-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/a-pictoral-argument-against-the-medicare-buy-in/</link>
	<description>Health Care Policy and Reform Insights &#124; NCPA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:29:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry C.</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/a-pictoral-argument-against-the-medicare-buy-in/comment-page-1/#comment-50549</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=7538#comment-50549</guid>
		<description>Maybe John Goodman and Linda Gorman and others who post here are bringing Uwe around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe John Goodman and Linda Gorman and others who post here are bringing Uwe around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe S.</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/a-pictoral-argument-against-the-medicare-buy-in/comment-page-1/#comment-50534</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=7538#comment-50534</guid>
		<description>I think we owe Uwe a round of thanks. He&#039;s usually so wrong about things. But he seems right on the mark on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we owe Uwe a round of thanks. He&#8217;s usually so wrong about things. But he seems right on the mark on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart Ingles</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/a-pictoral-argument-against-the-medicare-buy-in/comment-page-1/#comment-50525</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart Ingles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=7538#comment-50525</guid>
		<description>The whole premise of Medicare is that it is subsidized by taxpayers, including but not limited to the Medicare payroll tax.

Community rated plans need either an individual mandate or a substantial subsidy to be viable.  Medicare, risk pools, and employer-sponsored insurance are all subsidized.  They would not survive for long if the subsidies were eliminated, or even eliminated relative to competing underwritten plans.

Of course, if the community rating requirement becomes law then all insurance will be expensive for the healthy as well as the for the sickly.  In that case perhaps unsubsidized Medicare would seem competitive with other available plans, aided by cost-shifting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole premise of Medicare is that it is subsidized by taxpayers, including but not limited to the Medicare payroll tax.</p>
<p>Community rated plans need either an individual mandate or a substantial subsidy to be viable.  Medicare, risk pools, and employer-sponsored insurance are all subsidized.  They would not survive for long if the subsidies were eliminated, or even eliminated relative to competing underwritten plans.</p>
<p>Of course, if the community rating requirement becomes law then all insurance will be expensive for the healthy as well as the for the sickly.  In that case perhaps unsubsidized Medicare would seem competitive with other available plans, aided by cost-shifting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry C.</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/a-pictoral-argument-against-the-medicare-buy-in/comment-page-1/#comment-50521</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=7538#comment-50521</guid>
		<description>I agree with you Liz. Great pics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Liz. Great pics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/a-pictoral-argument-against-the-medicare-buy-in/comment-page-1/#comment-50514</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=7538#comment-50514</guid>
		<description>The mud and muck in the photos make everything crystal clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mud and muck in the photos make everything crystal clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devon Herrick</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/a-pictoral-argument-against-the-medicare-buy-in/comment-page-1/#comment-50512</link>
		<dc:creator>Devon Herrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=7538#comment-50512</guid>
		<description>The whole premise of a Medicare buy-in for 55 year olds does not stand to reason.  This group would have to be charged premiums far higher than they are willing to pay for such a plan to be actuarially sound.  Soon, there would be calls for government subsidies to reduce premiums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole premise of a Medicare buy-in for 55 year olds does not stand to reason.  This group would have to be charged premiums far higher than they are willing to pay for such a plan to be actuarially sound.  Soon, there would be calls for government subsidies to reduce premiums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

