Aetna: CDHC Lowers Costs, Improves Care

Aetna compared six years of experience for 2.2 million Aetna members in traditional coverage and 400,000 in a HealthFund CDH plan. Its

Comments (6)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Ron Greiner says:

    $7 million dollar savings per 10,000 insureds over 5 years is very low savings with HSA coverage. That’s only $140 a year savings per insured. The average cost for employer based health insurance is $400 a year for single coverage. HSA insurance for a 30-year-old male is only $60 a month in most states. The average savings should be more like $2,000 a year per employee, [plus] the tax savings because their is no payroll tax on employer HSA deposits. $2,000 X 10,000 employees = $20,000,000 per year or $100,000,000 over 5 years.

    But that’s the difference between dangerous non-portable employer-based health insurance and the security of low cost portable HSA “individual insurance.” Aetna sure did a good job with their so-called statistics to make HSAs look less attractive than they really are.

  2. Bruce says:

    Very interesting observation, Ron. I don’t think Aetna is even in the individual market.

  3. Ken says:

    That’s enough Aetna bashing. Aetna has been one of the most innovative companies in pushing the limits of consumer driven health care. We owe them a debt of gratitude.

  4. Greg Scandlen says:

    Ron, you misunderstood the bullet. The $7 million savings applied to employers who offered HSAs as an option. So, some large portion of the group was not in HSAs, very likely 75% or so. Yet the WHOLE group still saved money. The savings of the HSA enrollees is spread over the whole group.

  5. Bret says:

    I think Aetna was also helpful in persuading the Treasury to make rulings favorable to HSA expansion.

  6. Stephen C. says:

    Aetna Ceo Ron Williams has been very good on promoting CDHC in Congressional testimony and in public speeches.

Leave a Reply



If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar.