<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Diminishing Returns for Pharmaceuticals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthblog.ncpa.org/diminishing-returns-for-pharmaceuticals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/diminishing-returns-for-pharmaceuticals/</link>
	<description>Health Care Policy and Reform Insights &#124; NCPA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 22:14:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devon Herrick</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/diminishing-returns-for-pharmaceuticals/comment-page-1/#comment-49947</link>
		<dc:creator>Devon Herrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=7173#comment-49947</guid>
		<description>Diminishing returns is why consumers need to have more say (and financial responsibility) in the care they receive.  Dropping from 13% to 8% was a relative bargain (aspirin was cheap and streptokinase could dissolve clots). Further innovations lower the rate by four more percentage points.  As a society, we could spend infinite amounts of money seeking further reductions in cancer mortality, cardiac mortality, and so on.  But we&#039;d be buying additional years of life with increasingly large (marginal) dollars. Whether or not Americans want to spend, say, 80% of lifetime earnings gaining an extra year of life is not something bureaucrats at HHS should have the power to decide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diminishing returns is why consumers need to have more say (and financial responsibility) in the care they receive.  Dropping from 13% to 8% was a relative bargain (aspirin was cheap and streptokinase could dissolve clots). Further innovations lower the rate by four more percentage points.  As a society, we could spend infinite amounts of money seeking further reductions in cancer mortality, cardiac mortality, and so on.  But we&#8217;d be buying additional years of life with increasingly large (marginal) dollars. Whether or not Americans want to spend, say, 80% of lifetime earnings gaining an extra year of life is not something bureaucrats at HHS should have the power to decide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/diminishing-returns-for-pharmaceuticals/comment-page-1/#comment-49940</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=7173#comment-49940</guid>
		<description>Joe is right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe is right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe S.</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/diminishing-returns-for-pharmaceuticals/comment-page-1/#comment-49934</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=7173#comment-49934</guid>
		<description>This same argument has been made about all health care innovation. If everything else remains the same you find yourself moving along a curve with an ever flatter slope -- reflecting the diminishing returns.

However, innovation also casues the curve to shift to a higher level, where the diminishing returns  start all over again.

Wish I could draw this for you. I think you will find the diagram in one of David Cutler&#039;s books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This same argument has been made about all health care innovation. If everything else remains the same you find yourself moving along a curve with an ever flatter slope &#8212; reflecting the diminishing returns.</p>
<p>However, innovation also casues the curve to shift to a higher level, where the diminishing returns  start all over again.</p>
<p>Wish I could draw this for you. I think you will find the diagram in one of David Cutler&#8217;s books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/diminishing-returns-for-pharmaceuticals/comment-page-1/#comment-49927</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=7173#comment-49927</guid>
		<description>Surprise: returns diminish. Last time I checked, it&#039;s a law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surprise: returns diminish. Last time I checked, it&#8217;s a law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

