<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fat May not be Good After all</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthblog.ncpa.org/fat-may-not-be-good-after-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/fat-may-not-be-good-after-all/</link>
	<description>Health Care Policy and Reform Insights &#124; NCPA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 12:15:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devon Herrick</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/fat-may-not-be-good-after-all/comment-page-1/#comment-38813</link>
		<dc:creator>Devon Herrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/fat-may-not-be-good-after-all/#comment-38813</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jason Shafrin, of the Healthcare Economist Blog, recently had an interesting &lt;a href=&quot;http://healthcare-economist.com/2008/06/14/is-obesity-a-problem/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;post&lt;/a&gt;&#160;pondering whether the obesity epidemic is a public health problem? As evidence he cites an NBER &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nber.org/papers/w14010&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;paper&lt;/a&gt;&#160;by Philipson and Posner that explains how obesity more closely fits the criteria of a &#8220;private&#8221; health problem (i.e. it&#8217;s not a social cost).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The argument for government intervention against obesity posits that much of the health-related costs due to weight gain will be passed on to Medicaid and Medicare thus creating a negative externality. There are two counter-arguments, however. 1) Higher mortality rates among the obese reduce Social Security payments, which offsets any additional costs for health care. 2) If obesity creates a negative externality the best solution is to allow health insurers to experience-rate enrollees, charging higher premiums to those with above average expected costs.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason Shafrin, of the Healthcare Economist Blog, recently had an interesting <a href="http://healthcare-economist.com/2008/06/14/is-obesity-a-problem/" rel="nofollow">post</a>&nbsp;pondering whether the obesity epidemic is a public health problem? As evidence he cites an NBER <a href="http://www.nber.org/papers/w14010" rel="nofollow">paper</a>&nbsp;by Philipson and Posner that explains how obesity more closely fits the criteria of a &ldquo;private&rdquo; health problem (i.e. it&rsquo;s not a social cost).</p>
<p>The argument for government intervention against obesity posits that much of the health-related costs due to weight gain will be passed on to Medicaid and Medicare thus creating a negative externality. There are two counter-arguments, however. 1) Higher mortality rates among the obese reduce Social Security payments, which offsets any additional costs for health care. 2) If obesity creates a negative externality the best solution is to allow health insurers to experience-rate enrollees, charging higher premiums to those with above average expected costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronda</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/fat-may-not-be-good-after-all/comment-page-1/#comment-38740</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/fat-may-not-be-good-after-all/#comment-38740</guid>
		<description>You neglected to mention that the optimal fat tax varies a lot by race and sex.  For example, pound for pound of blubber, a black female should pay only about one-third  as much as the amount assessed on a white male – assuming the study is otherwise accurate.
 

Also, at Publix in Miami, the cost of M&amp;Ms with peanuts is closer to 5 cents a pop.


Just keeping you on your toes.


Ronda</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You neglected to mention that the optimal fat tax varies a lot by race and sex.  For example, pound for pound of blubber, a black female should pay only about one-third  as much as the amount assessed on a white male – assuming the study is otherwise accurate.</p>
<p>Also, at Publix in Miami, the cost of M&amp;Ms with peanuts is closer to 5 cents a pop.</p>
<p>Just keeping you on your toes.</p>
<p>Ronda</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

