<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hits &amp; Misses &#8211; 2009/3/25</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthblog.ncpa.org/hits-misses-2009325/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/hits-misses-2009325/</link>
	<description>Health Care Policy and Reform Insights &#124; NCPA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 02:53:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/hits-misses-2009325/comment-page-1/#comment-41680</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=2656#comment-41680</guid>
		<description>...in other words, something that neither side has reason to oppose, because they aren&#039;t painted into any corners.  But I suppose clean legislation is an oxymoron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;in other words, something that neither side has reason to oppose, because they aren&#8217;t painted into any corners.  But I suppose clean legislation is an oxymoron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/hits-misses-2009325/comment-page-1/#comment-41678</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=2656#comment-41678</guid>
		<description>Massachusetts is a model for the dangers of wholesale reform in any complex system, and an argument in favor of incrementalism so long as the increments are substantive.

A logical first increment might be the Venn diagram intersection of conservative and liberal proposals.  Not a &quot;compromise,&quot; but an Occam&#039;s razor approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Massachusetts is a model for the dangers of wholesale reform in any complex system, and an argument in favor of incrementalism so long as the increments are substantive.</p>
<p>A logical first increment might be the Venn diagram intersection of conservative and liberal proposals.  Not a &#8220;compromise,&#8221; but an Occam&#8217;s razor approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/hits-misses-2009325/comment-page-1/#comment-41664</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=2656#comment-41664</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t Massachusetts a potential model for Obama&#039;s health reform?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t Massachusetts a potential model for Obama&#8217;s health reform?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/hits-misses-2009325/comment-page-1/#comment-41658</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=2656#comment-41658</guid>
		<description>Kinsley is more than right. This is the best article I have seen on this wrongly decided case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kinsley is more than right. This is the best article I have seen on this wrongly decided case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/hits-misses-2009325/comment-page-1/#comment-41656</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=2656#comment-41656</guid>
		<description>Whatever you may think about the Massachussetts Health Plan (and it&#039;s not all bad), there is no mechanism there for controlling health care costs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever you may think about the Massachussetts Health Plan (and it&#8217;s not all bad), there is no mechanism there for controlling health care costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe S.</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/hits-misses-2009325/comment-page-1/#comment-41654</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=2656#comment-41654</guid>
		<description>Kinsley is normally wrong about almost everything. On this subject, he is surprisingly right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kinsley is normally wrong about almost everything. On this subject, he is surprisingly right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

