<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hits &amp; Misses #3 &#8211; 2009/6/23</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthblog.ncpa.org/hits-misses-3-2009623/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/hits-misses-3-2009623/</link>
	<description>Health Care Policy and Reform Insights &#124; NCPA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 02:53:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John R. Graham</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/hits-misses-3-2009623/comment-page-1/#comment-43437</link>
		<dc:creator>John R. Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=3996#comment-43437</guid>
		<description>And yet, we take it seriously when they survey the same people about the so-called &quot;public option&quot;, or whether they think insurers should be forbidden from charging higher premiums or excluding &quot;pre-existing conditions&quot; (i.e. selling actual insurance), or whether they&#039;d pay an extra $500 a year in taxes to &quot;cover every American&quot; (although it would cost a multiple of that to even approach &quot;universal&quot; coverage to the standard we have today).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And yet, we take it seriously when they survey the same people about the so-called &#8220;public option&#8221;, or whether they think insurers should be forbidden from charging higher premiums or excluding &#8220;pre-existing conditions&#8221; (i.e. selling actual insurance), or whether they&#8217;d pay an extra $500 a year in taxes to &#8220;cover every American&#8221; (although it would cost a multiple of that to even approach &#8220;universal&#8221; coverage to the standard we have today).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Gorman</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/hits-misses-3-2009623/comment-page-1/#comment-43431</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=3996#comment-43431</guid>
		<description>Nobody knows what the ideal BMI is. That said, this finding that chubbiness is associated with lower morbidity and mortality is not an isolated one. For example, overweight and obese patients on dialysis and with heart failure appear to have better survival rates. However, obesity may also reduce one&#039;s odds of surviving certain medical procedures so the answer, as the researchers say, is not clear.

To add to the confusion, in the US, the distribution of weight for children apparently stablized after 2003/2004. Whatever the cause of the shift was, it doesn&#039;t appear to have been fast food or vending machine snacks in schools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody knows what the ideal BMI is. That said, this finding that chubbiness is associated with lower morbidity and mortality is not an isolated one. For example, overweight and obese patients on dialysis and with heart failure appear to have better survival rates. However, obesity may also reduce one&#8217;s odds of surviving certain medical procedures so the answer, as the researchers say, is not clear.</p>
<p>To add to the confusion, in the US, the distribution of weight for children apparently stablized after 2003/2004. Whatever the cause of the shift was, it doesn&#8217;t appear to have been fast food or vending machine snacks in schools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/hits-misses-3-2009623/comment-page-1/#comment-43424</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=3996#comment-43424</guid>
		<description>The study supposedly corrects for smoking and health status.  But still it&#039;s only showing correlation and not causation.  The same as most such studies.  That said, what&#039;s the ideal BMI?  Above or below 25?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The study supposedly corrects for smoking and health status.  But still it&#8217;s only showing correlation and not causation.  The same as most such studies.  That said, what&#8217;s the ideal BMI?  Above or below 25?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bret</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/hits-misses-3-2009623/comment-page-1/#comment-43421</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=3996#comment-43421</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s not forget the rat studies -- showing that substntially reduced intake of food prolonged life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s not forget the rat studies &#8212; showing that substntially reduced intake of food prolonged life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/hits-misses-3-2009623/comment-page-1/#comment-43420</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=3996#comment-43420</guid>
		<description>Glad to see a study favorable to chubbiness. But can we generalize from the Japanese to everyone else?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see a study favorable to chubbiness. But can we generalize from the Japanese to everyone else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devon Herrick</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/hits-misses-3-2009623/comment-page-1/#comment-43419</link>
		<dc:creator>Devon Herrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=3996#comment-43419</guid>
		<description>The Japanese study that found chubby people outlive skinny people reminds me of an earlier study that found people who attend church regularly live longer than those who do not. This sounds evocative until you consider that people in failing health are frail and may not have the strength to attend church. In this regard regular church attendance is a proxy for health status.  Likewise, weight loss and being extremely underweight can be thought of as a proxy for frailty or failing health.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Japanese study that found chubby people outlive skinny people reminds me of an earlier study that found people who attend church regularly live longer than those who do not. This sounds evocative until you consider that people in failing health are frail and may not have the strength to attend church. In this regard regular church attendance is a proxy for health status.  Likewise, weight loss and being extremely underweight can be thought of as a proxy for frailty or failing health.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

