<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In the News and on the Net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthblog.ncpa.org/in-the-news-and-on-the-net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/in-the-news-and-on-the-net/</link>
	<description>Health Care Policy and Reform Insights &#124; NCPA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 12:46:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Greiner</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/in-the-news-and-on-the-net/comment-page-1/#comment-42761</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Greiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 12:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=3518#comment-42761</guid>
		<description>To bad the NCPA doesn&#039;t have a report that clearly states that employer-based health insurance is deadly.  680,000 American under the age of 65 get cancer every year.  

Young women, with no hair, losing their insurance is disgusting.  How many millions of Americans with cancer have lost their employer insurance since WW2?

If the NCPA does not hurry the New York Times is going to beat them to the punch.  Goofy reporters beating the the experts of the NCPA, get real.

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/22/is-employer-based-health-insurance-worth-saving/?hp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To bad the NCPA doesn&#8217;t have a report that clearly states that employer-based health insurance is deadly.  680,000 American under the age of 65 get cancer every year.  </p>
<p>Young women, with no hair, losing their insurance is disgusting.  How many millions of Americans with cancer have lost their employer insurance since WW2?</p>
<p>If the NCPA does not hurry the New York Times is going to beat them to the punch.  Goofy reporters beating the the experts of the NCPA, get real.</p>
<p><a href="http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/22/is-employer-based-health-insurance-worth-saving/?hp" rel="nofollow">http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/22/is-employer-based-health-insurance-worth-saving/?hp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry N.</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/in-the-news-and-on-the-net/comment-page-1/#comment-42750</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 19:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=3518#comment-42750</guid>
		<description>The messaging for McCain was horrible. Let&#039;s hope the messaging for this plan is an improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The messaging for McCain was horrible. Let&#8217;s hope the messaging for this plan is an improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/in-the-news-and-on-the-net/comment-page-1/#comment-42748</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 17:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=3518#comment-42748</guid>
		<description>Would like to hear your thoughts on the Coburn/Burr/Ryan/Nones bill (too bad this is being called the &quot;Republican bill&quot;).

Isn&#039;t this bill based on the ideas you and your colleagues developed at the NCPA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would like to hear your thoughts on the Coburn/Burr/Ryan/Nones bill (too bad this is being called the &#8220;Republican bill&#8221;).</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t this bill based on the ideas you and your colleagues developed at the NCPA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe S.</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/in-the-news-and-on-the-net/comment-page-1/#comment-42747</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 16:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=3518#comment-42747</guid>
		<description>The discussion at the Becker/Posner blog is actually quite interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The discussion at the Becker/Posner blog is actually quite interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

