<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Incentives Matter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthblog.ncpa.org/incentives-matter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/incentives-matter/</link>
	<description>Health Care Policy and Reform Insights &#124; NCPA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 12:46:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/incentives-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-43151</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=3842#comment-43151</guid>
		<description>The same concept should apply to incentives for purchase of insurance.  Just as lack of co-insurance encourages over-consumption of services, full reimbursement for premiums would encourage careless consumption of insurance products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same concept should apply to incentives for purchase of insurance.  Just as lack of co-insurance encourages over-consumption of services, full reimbursement for premiums would encourage careless consumption of insurance products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John R. Graham</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/incentives-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-43142</link>
		<dc:creator>John R. Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=3842#comment-43142</guid>
		<description>This kind of research is dangerous in the wrong hands.  To say that Medicare Part D should willy-nilly adopt the practices of Caterpillar ignores the key variable that is held fixed in the study - namely, Caterpillar!  There are all sorts of Caterpillar-specific cultural practices that we outsiders cannot observe that also contribute to outcomes.  The last thing we need is for CMS to dictate a $0 co-pay for generic statins and $35 for brand-name statins across the board.

The most dangerous thing in American health care is Barack Obama carrying a copy of the Dartmouth Atlas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This kind of research is dangerous in the wrong hands.  To say that Medicare Part D should willy-nilly adopt the practices of Caterpillar ignores the key variable that is held fixed in the study &#8211; namely, Caterpillar!  There are all sorts of Caterpillar-specific cultural practices that we outsiders cannot observe that also contribute to outcomes.  The last thing we need is for CMS to dictate a $0 co-pay for generic statins and $35 for brand-name statins across the board.</p>
<p>The most dangerous thing in American health care is Barack Obama carrying a copy of the Dartmouth Atlas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe S.</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/incentives-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-43139</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=3842#comment-43139</guid>
		<description>Why do we have to keep publishing papers and producing studies that confirm over and over again what the RAND Corporation established 30 years ago --incentives matter in health care?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do we have to keep publishing papers and producing studies that confirm over and over again what the RAND Corporation established 30 years ago &#8211;incentives matter in health care?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/incentives-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-43136</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=3842#comment-43136</guid>
		<description>This is the most important issue in health economics. Are we, or are we not, going to allow individuals to have good economic incentives with respect to the purchase of health  care?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the most important issue in health economics. Are we, or are we not, going to allow individuals to have good economic incentives with respect to the purchase of health  care?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

