<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Memories</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthblog.ncpa.org/memories/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/memories/</link>
	<description>Health Care Policy and Reform Insights &#124; NCPA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 20:46:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick R.</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/memories/comment-page-1/#comment-40063</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=1359#comment-40063</guid>
		<description>Does anybody at this blog honestly think that anyone in Washington cares one fig about learning from past mistakes?  Get real.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anybody at this blog honestly think that anyone in Washington cares one fig about learning from past mistakes?  Get real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/memories/comment-page-1/#comment-40030</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=1359#comment-40030</guid>
		<description>If I&#039;m not mistaken, there is also a parallel with the new Medicare prescription drug benefit. What mainly happened was a huge shift of financial burden from seniors to taxpayers with only a very small increase in the number of actual drugs taken by elderly patients.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I&#8217;m not mistaken, there is also a parallel with the new Medicare prescription drug benefit. What mainly happened was a huge shift of financial burden from seniors to taxpayers with only a very small increase in the number of actual drugs taken by elderly patients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry C</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/memories/comment-page-1/#comment-40023</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=1359#comment-40023</guid>
		<description>Devon, the bottom line is: huge increases in health care costs (for the elderly and everybody else) and no apparent improvement in health outcomes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Devon, the bottom line is: huge increases in health care costs (for the elderly and everybody else) and no apparent improvement in health outcomes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devon Herrick</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/memories/comment-page-1/#comment-40022</link>
		<dc:creator>Devon Herrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=1359#comment-40022</guid>
		<description>Most people understand how making something free could increase consumption.  For instance, if T-bone steak is on sale, you will likely buy more than if the price has just doubled.  

However, what many people fail to understand is how the Medicare program also affected the treatment patterns of doctors and hospitals.  Once seniors no longer had to pay for hospital stays, treatments became much more aggressive.  Doctors began to prescribe more medical interventions -- including unnecessary treatments, excess diagnostic testing, surgeries with little hope of success, etc.  Overtime medical technology advanced due to this boost in funding.  You could argue some of this added spending is good.  But it’s also safe to say much of it is ineffective, unnecessary and (according to Dartmouth) unhealthy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most people understand how making something free could increase consumption.  For instance, if T-bone steak is on sale, you will likely buy more than if the price has just doubled.  </p>
<p>However, what many people fail to understand is how the Medicare program also affected the treatment patterns of doctors and hospitals.  Once seniors no longer had to pay for hospital stays, treatments became much more aggressive.  Doctors began to prescribe more medical interventions &#8212; including unnecessary treatments, excess diagnostic testing, surgeries with little hope of success, etc.  Overtime medical technology advanced due to this boost in funding.  You could argue some of this added spending is good.  But it’s also safe to say much of it is ineffective, unnecessary and (according to Dartmouth) unhealthy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

