<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Party of Scrooge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthblog.ncpa.org/the-party-of-scrooge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/the-party-of-scrooge/</link>
	<description>Health Care Policy and Reform Insights &#124; NCPA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:03:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taxing the Poor — Again &#124; John Goodman's Health Policy Blog</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/the-party-of-scrooge/comment-page-1/#comment-41241</link>
		<dc:creator>Taxing the Poor — Again &#124; John Goodman's Health Policy Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 23:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/the-party-of-scrooge/#comment-41241</guid>
		<description>[...] to tax the poor to fund the State Children&#039;s Health Insurance Plan (SCHIP) program here and here. A Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) reenactment of the tobacco settlement is here. This is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to tax the poor to fund the State Children&#39;s Health Insurance Plan (SCHIP) program here and here. A Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) reenactment of the tobacco settlement is here. This is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Hesketh, M.D.(soon)</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/the-party-of-scrooge/comment-page-1/#comment-13988</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Hesketh, M.D.(soon)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 07:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/the-party-of-scrooge/#comment-13988</guid>
		<description>I truly appreciated this article.  Much of it was well rationalized and thought provoking.  But I must agree with Linda above - are 8 out of 10 kids enough?  Is covering the remaining 2 kids worth the crowd-out and lower quality care (by your standards)?  And as for the tobacco tax - wouldn&#039;t it be justified for the lowest fifth pay for the care that will be benefiting this same demographic?

I would also like to make an observation about Medicare Advantage as this is a common bone of contention among politicians.  The cuts to Medicare Advantage outlined by the House Bill are often used (or rather, misused) as a soundbite by Republicans - it is common to hear that these cuts will negatively impact seniors&#039; quality of and access to care.  However, Medicare Advantage is currently well over-funded, and studies have shown that this overpayment has not been reflected in improved quality of care nor physician reimbursement.  In many cases, traditional fee-for-service patients receive better care.

I thoroughly enjoy being exposed to all sides of this issue.  Please keep up the great work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I truly appreciated this article.  Much of it was well rationalized and thought provoking.  But I must agree with Linda above &#8211; are 8 out of 10 kids enough?  Is covering the remaining 2 kids worth the crowd-out and lower quality care (by your standards)?  And as for the tobacco tax &#8211; wouldn&#8217;t it be justified for the lowest fifth pay for the care that will be benefiting this same demographic?</p>
<p>I would also like to make an observation about Medicare Advantage as this is a common bone of contention among politicians.  The cuts to Medicare Advantage outlined by the House Bill are often used (or rather, misused) as a soundbite by Republicans &#8211; it is common to hear that these cuts will negatively impact seniors&#8217; quality of and access to care.  However, Medicare Advantage is currently well over-funded, and studies have shown that this overpayment has not been reflected in improved quality of care nor physician reimbursement.  In many cases, traditional fee-for-service patients receive better care.</p>
<p>I thoroughly enjoy being exposed to all sides of this issue.  Please keep up the great work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis J. Gonzalez</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/the-party-of-scrooge/comment-page-1/#comment-13407</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis J. Gonzalez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 19:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/the-party-of-scrooge/#comment-13407</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your interesting article. You are right and the ways things are going with the Democratic controlled Congress, things will get worse and eventually we will wind up having &quot;universal health care.&quot; But what can I as a citizen do??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your interesting article. You are right and the ways things are going with the Democratic controlled Congress, things will get worse and eventually we will wind up having &#8220;universal health care.&#8221; But what can I as a citizen do??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John B. Sullivan, MD, MBA</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/the-party-of-scrooge/comment-page-1/#comment-13130</link>
		<dc:creator>John B. Sullivan, MD, MBA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/the-party-of-scrooge/#comment-13130</guid>
		<description>I am troubled by your editorial regarding the children&#039;s health insurance program. No doubt about it, America has no health care system to compare to Canada&#039;s. Waits for both private pay and government covered patients in the USA are long, probbably as long as any wait yoiu may anecdotally identify in Canada. Most physicians in Arizona would prefer an end to the managed care for- profit insurance system because it is more miserable than the goverenment systems we endure. Universal health care is a necessity and can be in the form of a hybrid: government, private for prfit and private not-for-profit. As a health care administrator in Tucson, Arizona and as a physician, I can assure you that medicaid (AHCCCS) patients receive care as fast and equal to any person in a private plan. And the government plans pay more and cost less to administer than the &quot;privates.&quot; You have no rational or financial basis for your argument, just ideology. Please prepare yourself for universal care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am troubled by your editorial regarding the children&#8217;s health insurance program. No doubt about it, America has no health care system to compare to Canada&#8217;s. Waits for both private pay and government covered patients in the USA are long, probbably as long as any wait yoiu may anecdotally identify in Canada. Most physicians in Arizona would prefer an end to the managed care for- profit insurance system because it is more miserable than the goverenment systems we endure. Universal health care is a necessity and can be in the form of a hybrid: government, private for prfit and private not-for-profit. As a health care administrator in Tucson, Arizona and as a physician, I can assure you that medicaid (AHCCCS) patients receive care as fast and equal to any person in a private plan. And the government plans pay more and cost less to administer than the &#8220;privates.&#8221; You have no rational or financial basis for your argument, just ideology. Please prepare yourself for universal care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Pejchar</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/the-party-of-scrooge/comment-page-1/#comment-13129</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Pejchar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/the-party-of-scrooge/#comment-13129</guid>
		<description>How can you sleep at night? You are saying it&#039;s okay if 2 out of 10 kids don&#039;t receive health care? What if those were your kids? I am trying to help a woman with a 6 year old...she works 40 hours a week, her husband has disability of 1,000 a month and they bring in $580 more than can qualify for insurance, not only for the mother but for the child. The total household income for a family of 3 cannot exceed $2800 a month. Before taxes etc they bring home $28,580. You tell her what she is to do? Why is it that the US is the ONLY developed country in THE WORLD that does not provide health care to all of its citizens? It&#039;s ok to spend a trillion dollars on a disastrous war in Iraq but not ok to provide the basic of all human needs...access to healthcare.

What is your &#039;innovative private-sector solution&#039; to millions of mothers and children like this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can you sleep at night? You are saying it&#8217;s okay if 2 out of 10 kids don&#8217;t receive health care? What if those were your kids? I am trying to help a woman with a 6 year old&#8230;she works 40 hours a week, her husband has disability of 1,000 a month and they bring in $580 more than can qualify for insurance, not only for the mother but for the child. The total household income for a family of 3 cannot exceed $2800 a month. Before taxes etc they bring home $28,580. You tell her what she is to do? Why is it that the US is the ONLY developed country in THE WORLD that does not provide health care to all of its citizens? It&#8217;s ok to spend a trillion dollars on a disastrous war in Iraq but not ok to provide the basic of all human needs&#8230;access to healthcare.</p>
<p>What is your &#8216;innovative private-sector solution&#8217; to millions of mothers and children like this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regina Herzlinger</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/the-party-of-scrooge/comment-page-1/#comment-13128</link>
		<dc:creator>Regina Herzlinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/the-party-of-scrooge/#comment-13128</guid>
		<description>This is really great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Brankin</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/the-party-of-scrooge/comment-page-1/#comment-13011</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Brankin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 16:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/the-party-of-scrooge/#comment-13011</guid>
		<description>Great job. Keep up the good fight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great job. Keep up the good fight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vijay Goel, M.D.</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/the-party-of-scrooge/comment-page-1/#comment-12844</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijay Goel, M.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 22:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/the-party-of-scrooge/#comment-12844</guid>
		<description>Terrific article.  As I mention in my blog, which cites your article, the SCHIP expansion focuses on an entitlement that doesn&#039;t affect the day-to-day lives of children.  Looking to meaningfully improve the long-term health of children requires an examination of many other aspects of their lives-- and our neglect of nutrition in schools, physical education programs, and healthy habits are much bigger targets that can fundamentally change the economics afor our future generation&#039;s health needs (as well as allow them to live fuller, more fulfilling lives).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrific article.  As I mention in my blog, which cites your article, the SCHIP expansion focuses on an entitlement that doesn&#8217;t affect the day-to-day lives of children.  Looking to meaningfully improve the long-term health of children requires an examination of many other aspects of their lives&#8211; and our neglect of nutrition in schools, physical education programs, and healthy habits are much bigger targets that can fundamentally change the economics afor our future generation&#8217;s health needs (as well as allow them to live fuller, more fulfilling lives).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David J. Lenihan</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/the-party-of-scrooge/comment-page-1/#comment-12739</link>
		<dc:creator>David J. Lenihan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/the-party-of-scrooge/#comment-12739</guid>
		<description>Excellent editorial…..as usual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent editorial…..as usual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: House Republican staffer</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/the-party-of-scrooge/comment-page-1/#comment-12737</link>
		<dc:creator>House Republican staffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/the-party-of-scrooge/#comment-12737</guid>
		<description>Another point you should make is that the Democrats are making promises that they can&#039;t keep.  The Senate bill slashes funding for SCHIP in 2013, because they didn’t have enough to pay for the ten year costs (funding allotment goes from $8 B to $400 M).  House Democrats will face the same problem, because their bill is currently $76 B short of being budget neutral over 10 years.  Democrats are promising to expand health insurance, but it’s actually a huge bait and switch, because they fail to provide for the true costs of their massive SCHIP expansion.  Bottom line is more kids will eventually lose health insurance coverage under the Dem bills.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another point you should make is that the Democrats are making promises that they can&#8217;t keep.  The Senate bill slashes funding for SCHIP in 2013, because they didn’t have enough to pay for the ten year costs (funding allotment goes from $8 B to $400 M).  House Democrats will face the same problem, because their bill is currently $76 B short of being budget neutral over 10 years.  Democrats are promising to expand health insurance, but it’s actually a huge bait and switch, because they fail to provide for the true costs of their massive SCHIP expansion.  Bottom line is more kids will eventually lose health insurance coverage under the Dem bills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

