<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: There is Buried Treasure in the Radio Spectrum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthblog.ncpa.org/there-is-buried-treasure-in-the-radio-spectrum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/there-is-buried-treasure-in-the-radio-spectrum/</link>
	<description>Health Care Policy and Reform Insights &#124; NCPA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 14:14:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul H.</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/there-is-buried-treasure-in-the-radio-spectrum/comment-page-1/#comment-54618</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=9193#comment-54618</guid>
		<description>Has anybody ever done robotic surgery at a distance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anybody ever done robotic surgery at a distance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: artk</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/there-is-buried-treasure-in-the-radio-spectrum/comment-page-1/#comment-54508</link>
		<dc:creator>artk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=9193#comment-54508</guid>
		<description>Well, I seem to remember that they have a problem with the drones, anyone could pick up the video feeds.  Additionally, the fail safe on a drone is just just crash without arming the weapons.  The point of remote surgery is that the expertise isn&#039;t available locally.  I suppose the fail safe on robotic surgery is it just stops until your surgeon travels cross country to finish the operation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I seem to remember that they have a problem with the drones, anyone could pick up the video feeds.  Additionally, the fail safe on a drone is just just crash without arming the weapons.  The point of remote surgery is that the expertise isn&#8217;t available locally.  I suppose the fail safe on robotic surgery is it just stops until your surgeon travels cross country to finish the operation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil H.</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/there-is-buried-treasure-in-the-radio-spectrum/comment-page-1/#comment-54498</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=9193#comment-54498</guid>
		<description>artk raises an interesting question. Surely there is a way of making the communication more reliable. How does the military control the drones?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>artk raises an interesting question. Surely there is a way of making the communication more reliable. How does the military control the drones?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: artk</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/there-is-buried-treasure-in-the-radio-spectrum/comment-page-1/#comment-54497</link>
		<dc:creator>artk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=9193#comment-54497</guid>
		<description>How reliable is your cell phone?  Do you want to undergo robotic surgery that&#039;s as reliable as your cell phone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How reliable is your cell phone?  Do you want to undergo robotic surgery that&#8217;s as reliable as your cell phone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry C.</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/there-is-buried-treasure-in-the-radio-spectrum/comment-page-1/#comment-54494</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=9193#comment-54494</guid>
		<description>Devon: I can&#039;t recall having seen anything worth viewing on the over-the-air channels in years. If you were completely cut off, and had to listen to radio instead, your loss would be small.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Devon: I can&#8217;t recall having seen anything worth viewing on the over-the-air channels in years. If you were completely cut off, and had to listen to radio instead, your loss would be small.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devon Herrick</title>
		<link>http://healthblog.ncpa.org/there-is-buried-treasure-in-the-radio-spectrum/comment-page-1/#comment-54492</link>
		<dc:creator>Devon Herrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/?p=9193#comment-54492</guid>
		<description>Interesting thought.  Auction off the spectrum, forcing the shrinking 9% of the population (me included) that watch over-the air TV to subscribe to cable. As we have seen with the recent switch to digital television signals, any gains from a better use for the spectrum would undoubtedly be minimized when advocates for the 9% argue there needs to be subsidies to help the poor with their cable bill.  

Before you know it, rather than the 5% or 6% of households that are too poor to afford cable, another 45% would claim the right to subsidized public TV. 

This is not unlike health reform -- force people to buy something they don’t want, and then subsidize their purchase in the interest of fairness.  If the government were to subsidize cable TV, households would undoubtedly have to accept many channels that they do not want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thought.  Auction off the spectrum, forcing the shrinking 9% of the population (me included) that watch over-the air TV to subscribe to cable. As we have seen with the recent switch to digital television signals, any gains from a better use for the spectrum would undoubtedly be minimized when advocates for the 9% argue there needs to be subsidies to help the poor with their cable bill.  </p>
<p>Before you know it, rather than the 5% or 6% of households that are too poor to afford cable, another 45% would claim the right to subsidized public TV. </p>
<p>This is not unlike health reform &#8212; force people to buy something they don’t want, and then subsidize their purchase in the interest of fairness.  If the government were to subsidize cable TV, households would undoubtedly have to accept many channels that they do not want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

