Who Owns the World’s Oil? Government.
Read full Wall Street Journal article here.
Health Care Policy and Reform Insights | NCPA
-
Subscribe
John Goodman’s Health Alerts
Published twice per week, Health Alerts are exclusive, in-depth analyses of health care policy by John Goodman. Subscribe via RSS or enter your email address in the box above.Categories
-
Authors
Tags
American Medical Association cancer CBO consumer driven health care diabetes doctors drugs electronic medical records email emergency room EMR ER exercise FDA genetics Health Care Access Health Care Costs health care quality health insurance health IT health policy Health Reform Health Savings Accounts heart disease hospital HSA insurance life expectancy Massachusetts Medicaid Medicare medicare advantage NHS ObamaCare obesity pay for performance public option SCHIP seniors socialized health care Social Security stimulus tax unemployment UninsuredMedia
Recommended Reading
Recognition and Awards
Site Visitors
About the NCPA
The National Center for Policy Analysis (NCPA) is a think tank, established in 1983, that develops and promotes free-market reforms in health care, taxes, retirement and environment. Read more about our ideas in health reform.
Recent Comments
- will on Should You Be Able to Sell Your Kidney?
- aurelius on Should You Be Able to Sell Your Kidney?
- Rob Roy on Should You Be Able to Sell Your Kidney?
- Rob Roy on Unskilled Labor, and Other News
- Samson on Should You Be Able to Sell Your Kidney?
- brian on Should You Be Able to Sell Your Kidney?
Archives
© Copyright National Center for Policy Analysis 2012. All rights reserved.
This chart says it all. Oil is controlled by governments.
I used to think Exxon was huge. All the protesters told us it was huge. Actually it is relatively tiny.
Look at the list of governments that own oil reserves and compare their degree of freedom. Numerous studies from development economics have found that abundant natural resources often allows repressive regimes to ignore their economy because they have a ready source of funds other than taxes.
Devon, it’s called the curse of natural resource wealth.
This table gives a whole new meaning to the term “big oil.”
What does the “curse” imply?
That countries with relatively few natural resources have more economic growth because it’s harder for first movers to take over and extract serious profits? Or that profits are distributed more equally and thus create incentives for everyone to work?
I wonder if there are some other social analogies that we can draw: It’s always the “not-so-handsome” guys that do well after high school. They have to work harder to be successful. Whereas those that had things handed to them do not learn to make their own success.
Just an idea. Although I don’t think it completely captures the essence of the argument, it’s an interesting thought.
Curse: instead of normal development (e.g., like Hong Kong), the existence of one valuable resource creates enormous corruption and bad government which then makes it impossible for normal development to occur.